Rating distribution for Maximus Dirtbagicus
Ratings
Mon 10th Feb 09:15
Did not like as compared to other boards with global format.
World War rated 
Fair
Fair
Did not like as compared to other boards with global format.
Mon 10th Feb 09:13
More difficult as one has to control the sea lanes to get to unconnected land masses. Direct approaches should require one to defeat a "3" versus a "2" to advance.
More difficult as one has to control the sea lanes to get to unconnected land masses. Direct approaches should require one to defeat a "3" versus a "2" to advance.
Mon 10th Feb 09:08
Constrained fighting paths force different strategies as compared to other games.
Constrained fighting paths force different strategies as compared to other games.
Mon 10th Feb 09:05
Game is good except it is too easy to get bumped off in the caverns. having 9 and taken out by 1 unit with 100% chance of victory is not realistic except in the case on nukes.
Game is good except it is too easy to get bumped off in the caverns. having 9 and taken out by 1 unit with 100% chance of victory is not realistic except in the case on nukes.
Mon 10th Feb 09:03
Waaaay too simple, too few territories. Game winner influenced easily by the initial distribution at game set-up.
Waaaay too simple, too few territories. Game winner influenced easily by the initial distribution at game set-up.
Mon 10th Feb 09:00
Lots of territories, and the theme makes you want to "make the hit" on your opponents. Gotti is perfect choice as wild card.
Lots of territories, and the theme makes you want to "make the hit" on your opponents. Gotti is perfect choice as wild card.
Mon 10th Feb 08:54
Too simple. would be much better if more terroritories.
Too simple. would be much better if more terroritories.
Mon 10th Feb 08:48
Primary dislike is that the fortifications at the eadge of your base are easier to overcome versus the central passage way. It should be the opposite.
Primary dislike is that the fortifications at the eadge of your base are easier to overcome versus the central passage way. It should be the opposite.
Sun 9th Feb 20:35
Board seems simple, not too much different from other games except more of africa. The three transfers during one turn makes this easier than other boards.
Board seems simple, not too much different from other games except more of africa. The three transfers during one turn makes this easier than other boards.
Sat 8th Feb 20:25
Board is good (some numbers hard to read near pumping stations), name for colors are unique in a good sense. 3 transfers would be better like most of the other boards.
Board is good (some numbers hard to read near pumping stations), name for colors are unique in a good sense. 3 transfers would be better like most of the other boards.
Fri 22nd Nov 20:48
Towers or not, the game is excellent because it has its unique qualities :-)
Towers or not, the game is excellent because it has its unique qualities :-)
Wed 6th Nov 02:16
Game would only be better if players could partial place units awarded at start of turn like the CW board.
Game would only be better if players could partial place units awarded at start of turn like the CW board.
Sat 19th Oct 15:22
Awesome! Like the unique feature involving the Crown. A new Favorite :-).
Awesome! Like the unique feature involving the Crown. A new Favorite :-).
Mon 21st May 20:21
Absolutely love the game! Only improvement that I would make is to be able place armies multiple times during the same turn. Multiple deployments as conditions develop is real world.
Absolutely love the game! Only improvement that I would make is to be able place armies multiple times during the same turn. Multiple deployments as conditions develop is real world.
Mon 9th Apr 00:53
This board has more definition than the other CW boards. My only dislike is that some cities are within territorial borders. In reality, the taking of a city generally meant controlling a region because people would flee an invading army.
This board has more definition than the other CW boards. My only dislike is that some cities are within territorial borders. In reality, the taking of a city generally meant controlling a region because people would flee an invading army.